I'm curious as to how Craig will respond
He's assuming too much of Craig's argument. . .
I just got here recently. Craig is beating Hitchens right?
logically: a landslide. hard to tell rhetorically from the blog...
Again, no sufficient or consistent treatment of the Christian doctrine on God's judgment, its nature and extent and its distribution...
The funny thing is he got away with it for 25 years. If he would've died before being caught or never being caught then he wouldn't have been doing anything wrong from a relativist standpoint. He avoided the social disadvantages to his behavior.
I think Hitchen's is assuming Christianity is true... then implying...
Hitchen is assuming an objective morality but not providing an objective source for it.
Guess we're going to have to wait for a video at some distant point in the future to figure out what Craig answered.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.