Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Followers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(57)
-
▼
April
(56)
- Pre-Order the Debate DVD
- Thank You!
- Wrap Up
- Hitchens on Evil
- Problem of Suffering
- Extended discussion
- QUESTIONS
- QUESTIONS
- QUESTIONS
- Craig - closing arguments
- Hitchens - second session
- Hitchens - second session
- Hitchens - second session
- The immediate experience
- Craig - The moral argument
- Craig - Second Session
- (continued)
- Cross Examination: Hitchens to Craig
- Cross Examination: Craig to Hitchens
- (continued)
- Cross Examination: Craig to Hitchens
- Free Will
- The problem with the Golden Rule
- Rebuttal on the moral argument
- What you have to accept to believe in God
- Rebuttal - Hitchens
- The Moral argument and the Resurrection
- The Teleological Argument - answer
- In order to reject the conclusion, you must reject...
- Deism vs. Theism
- Why did God wait so long to send Christ
- Rebuttal 1 - Craig
- The fact that the universe is heading for destruc...
- The failure of Christian cosmology
- The Christian conflict
- Atheists shouldn't be required to prove there is n...
- An Arrogance to the Christian view
- Retrospection of Evidentialism
- Opening Arguments - Hithchens (20 minutes)
- In summation
- The final argument - the personal experience of God
- The Argument of the Resurrection of Jesus
- The Moral Argument
- The Teleological Argument
- Craig - The cosmological argument
- Dr. Craig Opening Argument (20 minutes)
- Moderator Hugh Hewitt
- Books by the debate participants
- Debate sponsors
- The Debate Kicks Off.
- Pre-debate photos
- Debate Moderator and Host
- How the Blog Will Work
- Introducing the Participants in Tonight's Debate
- Welcome!
- Does God Exist? A Debate with Christopher Hitchens...
-
▼
April
(56)
appreciate the live comments. thanks, lenny. have been praying today for Dr. Craig
ReplyDeleteThis is Hitch's true soft underbelly. He asserts moral claims, but can't ground them ontologically. Meanwhile, I've always thought the title of his book "God is not Great: How religion Poisons Everything" borrows from the very worldview he find so contemptible. That is, in order for religion to "poison" everything, everything must have intrinsic purposes. But that suggests design....
ReplyDeleteright on SK! no ones every cornered him to actually answer to that!!
ReplyDeleteYes he's taking an untennable position in affirming morality without grounding it in God. To criticize God morally is to assume morality and thus to assume God. How else can morality be meaningfully grounded but in the God it seeks to criticize.
ReplyDelete